作者 主题: 明知故犯: 博特拉大学(UPM)2名讲师涉嫌抄袭他人作品。  (阅读 3960 次)

离线 alvin_cy

  • 超级会员
  • *****
  • 帖子: 1,563
  • 评价: +4/-2
    • 查看个人资料


东方日报:

http://www2.orientaldaily.com.my/read/GEN/2rsA0KcJ0T5t9EoG0Kp49iT01yEm7PjW


 涉嫌抄襲出書 講師竟擢升教授

(檳城16日訊)檳州第二副首長拉瑪沙米爆料,曾經有涉嫌抄襲學術作品的學術人員,非但沒有得到應得懲罰,反而在轉往其他大學就職后,躍升成為教授!

曾在國民大學任職25年的拉瑪沙米表示,他在國大教書時,曾經發生過一名講師被揭發涉嫌抄襲之下,出版了多達10本學術作品,而其中也有作品是被國家語言及出版局收錄。

影響學術公信力

他在出席檳州政府916馬來西亞日慶典活動后,在記者會上指出,這名講師只是將外籍學術書本翻譯成馬來文,但沒有全文翻譯,反而隔著一個段落去逐字翻譯,在完成后便宣稱這是該講師的原作。

他表示,這名講師的行徑被揭發后,便離開國大轉到北方大學任職,但是這名講師在北大反而更獲賞識,成為該大學的教授。無論如何,他并不愿意透露詳情,包括這名教授在什麼系院授課。

他說,就大學作為知識殿堂而言,抄襲比偷竊書本是更嚴重的罪行,因為這樣的風氣足以影響一所大學的學術公信力。

冀高教部設委會

因此,為了表達他對著課題的重視,他將會在10月份的國會里,向高教部長提出有關這課題的提問,以要求高教部能夠更嚴正看待及處理我國大專學術人員,抄襲文化的問題。

他更將抄襲形容為我國國立及私立大專的嚴重通病,畢竟他在國大教書時就曾經捉拿過數名抄襲的大專生。但是,不只是大專生,講師、副教授和教授們都在抄襲。

他對高教部長期沒有解決這問題表示失望,并希望日前爆發2名博大講師涉抄襲案件后,高教部能成立一個委員會,解決這問題。

他不滿博大只是凍結2名涉抄襲講師的獎勵金,以及將此事記錄在他們的服務履歷表,並認為這2名講師應該立即被革職。






涉嫌抄袭美网站作品 博大2讲师遭对付
二零零九年九月十四日 下午五时三十六分

(八打灵再也14日讯)博特拉大学(UPM)2名讲师因涉嫌抄袭而面对事业危机。

6年前,1名教授与1名刚获取哲学博士学位的女教授曾出版一本“Writing an Effective Resume”书,教导待业者如何正确书写履历信。

惟1年后,有人质疑这两名教职员涉嫌抄袭美国多家大学网站的作品,其中包括著名的哈佛大学及艾尔比奥学院。

博特拉大学经过展开调查后发现,该厚达64页的书是2名讲师几乎一字不漏抄袭出来的“作品”,尽管作者出版前曾依照本地文化修改,以让本地读者更易理解其中内容。

高教部总监拿督拉丁接获有关投诉投报后,已即刻展开调查工作。

他向本地《太阳报》表示,有关当局将援引大学与大学学院法令及法定团体法令对付涉案者。

以博大法律局为首的调查小组披露,处罚行动可能包括涉案讲师必需向有关大学缴付版税或遭起诉。

博大校长拿督聂慕斯达法也表示,这两名讲师的事业或许因而跌入谷底,短期内难以创事业高峰。

他说:“要证明某人涉及抄袭确实不易,但一旦证实了,那涉案者就必需承担其后果。”他也补充说,其中一名作者已对自己的抄袭举动深感后悔。

他说,大学教职员应该以这次的事件警戒自己,勿犯下同样的错误。

聂慕斯达法也披露,博大拥有出版委员会负责监督各刊物或文章是否符合《泰晤士高等教育》世界大学综合排行榜的准则。

惟随着发生讲师涉嫌抄袭事件后,该大学将设立一个次出版委员会,主要专注予为文章或刊物做最后检查,然后才送往出版社。

有关刊物的原著未获通知自己的作品遭抄袭。



sumber:
http://www.kwongwah.com.my/news/2009/09/14/105.html
« 最后编辑时间: 九月 16, 2009, 10:57:51 下午 作者 alvin_cy »
[email protected]


zhengyichang.wordpress.com

离线 alvin_cy

  • 超级会员
  • *****
  • 帖子: 1,563
  • 评价: +4/-2
    • 查看个人资料
Re: 博特拉大学(UPM)2名讲师涉嫌抄袭他人作品。
« 回复 #1 于: 九月 16, 2009, 10:53:10 下午 »
2博大講師涉嫌抄襲


http://www.sinchew-i.com/node/115247?tid=3


 2009-09-14 12:40

(吉隆坡)教育界再爆抄襲醜聞!博大兩名講師6年前撰寫的一本書,涉嫌抄襲哈佛大學, 學院網站文章。


根據《太陽報》報導,博大兩名學術人員,一名教授以及一名目前獲得博士文憑的女學術人員,聯合撰寫了一本名為《撰寫一份有效的履歷表》,以作為畢業學生撰寫履歷表參考書籍。

不過,大約一年前,這本書的內容被發現與一些美國大學,如哈佛大學、學院網站的部份資料相似,於是博大針對此事展開調查。

大學當局在調查中,發現這本64頁的書籍內容雖然是以本地角度切入,但是大部份內容包括履歷表的定義、提呈履歷表、網絡、策劃徵聘資料、內容等,近乎每個字都與網上資料一樣。

高等教育局總監拿督拉丁承認有受到有關投訴,而他們也正展開調查。

他補充,如果證實有此事,他們將原因大學及大學學院法令採取行動,懲罰這兩名明知故犯的學術人員。

星洲互動‧2009.09.14
« 最后编辑时间: 九月 16, 2009, 11:02:01 下午 作者 alvin_cy »
[email protected]


zhengyichang.wordpress.com

离线 alvin_cy

  • 超级会员
  • *****
  • 帖子: 1,563
  • 评价: +4/-2
    • 查看个人资料
Re: 明知故犯: 博特拉大学(UPM)2名讲师涉嫌抄袭他人作品。
« 回复 #2 于: 九月 16, 2009, 11:02:50 下午 »
出書涉及抄襲
2博大講師面對處分

(八打靈再也14日訊)兩名博特拉大學講師,因涉抄襲和盜用資料,而面對處分。

6年前,該大學一名講師和一名剛考獲博士學位的學術家,出版一本名為“撰寫有效的履歷”,但年前有關書籍卻引起學術界人士猜疑,因發現有關書籍資料,抄襲來自美國大學網站的材料,包括哈佛和艾 柋葕W大學。

根據博大調查顯示,儘管有關書籍是供本地學生使用,在64頁的書籍中,有許多內容似乎是每字照抄,包括詮釋履歷、目的、撰寫履歷、網絡、組織受聘資料和個人簡歷等。

高教部總監拿督拉丁烏馬對《太陽報》指出,他已接獲相關投報,調查工作仍在進行。

“我們當然是不能接受抄襲文化,特別是在高等教育大環境下。”

他說,他們會在大學及大專院校法令下,面對處分,包括要這兩名講師償還版稅給大學,以及接受被警戒。

博大副校長拿督聶慕斯達化說,其實要證明抄襲並不容易,因有時候這與表達有關,但不幸的是,這兩名講師必須面對,其中一人已對此事表現悔意。



http://www.chinapress.com.my/content_new.asp?dt=2009-09-15&sec=mas&art=0915mc72.txt
« 最后编辑时间: 九月 16, 2009, 11:20:10 下午 作者 alvin_cy »
[email protected]


zhengyichang.wordpress.com

离线 alvin_cy

  • 超级会员
  • *****
  • 帖子: 1,563
  • 评价: +4/-2
    • 查看个人资料
Re: 明知故犯: 博特拉大学(UPM)2名讲师涉嫌抄袭他人作品。
« 回复 #3 于: 九月 16, 2009, 11:13:42 下午 »



在学术界边缘工作, 这是学术界最避忌最不可以发生的事情了。。。
[email protected]


zhengyichang.wordpress.com

离线 alvin_cy

  • 超级会员
  • *****
  • 帖子: 1,563
  • 评价: +4/-2
    • 查看个人资料
Re: 明知故犯: 博特拉大学(UPM)2名讲师涉嫌抄袭他人作品。
« 回复 #4 于: 九月 16, 2009, 11:17:09 下午 »



http://sun2surf.com/article.cfm?id=37967


UPM duo in plagiarism scandal
Llew-Ann Phang

PETALING JAYA (Sept 13, 2009) : Two Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) lecturers are facing career-damaging action for plagiarism.


Prof Datuk Dr Radin Umar
Radin Sohadi
Six years ago, the two academicians – a professor and one who recently received her PhD – produced a reference book titled "Writing an Effective Resume" meant for management students on writing impactful resumes that would attract potential employers.

However, about a year ago, suspicions arose within academia that the book may have plagiarised materials of several American university websites, including Harvard and Albion College.

Investigations conducted by the university discovered that a "substantial" amount of the 64-page book was lifted almost word-for-word, albeit given a local touch.

It, among others, defines a resume and its purpose, making the resume appealing, networking, organising the employment portfolio and preparing curriculum vitae.

Higher Education Ministry director-general Prof Datuk Dr Radin Umar Radin Sohadi acknowledged receiving the complaint and that investigations are ongoing.

"We certainly cannot accept plagiarism, especially in the higher education environment," he said, adding that punitive action would be taken under the Universities and University Colleges Act and Statutory Bodies (Discipline and Surcharge) Act (Act 605).

"It is under the purview of the university. I spoke to the legal director and UPM is taking very serious action on the staff according to the Act," Radin Umar said in an email to theSun.

Investigations headed by UPM's Legal Department concluded that among the actions to be taken are that they repay royalties to the university, as well as a "severe reprimand on their personal file".

UPM vice-chancellor Prof Datuk Dr Nik Mustapha R. Abdullah told theSun in a recent interview that this would mean a slow climb up the rungs for the two authors.

"It's very difficult to prove plagiarism also because sometimes it's about expression but it's very unfortunate as they will have to suffer," he said, adding that one of the authors expressed sincere regret over the matter.

"It's the price you have to pay. It was unintentional and it's our first case of plagiarism and the printers suffer the biggest loss because the books cannot be sold," he said.

Nik Mustapha said the episode serves as a lesson to all university staff – deans, directors and senior officers – who have all been issued a warning on the severity of such acts.

He said the university has a Publications Committee which screens material to be published albeit it is focused on journals and articles, as part of the university's efforts to scale up the annual QS World University Rankings by Times Higher Education.

"UPM will have a sub-committee that will be dedicated to screen materials for books following this. Before the book is sent for publication, the draft of the material will need to get an endorsement from the Publications Committee," said Nik Mustapha.

The authors and publishers of the original material have not been notified.
[email protected]


zhengyichang.wordpress.com

离线 alvin_cy

  • 超级会员
  • *****
  • 帖子: 1,563
  • 评价: +4/-2
    • 查看个人资料
Re: 明知故犯: 博特拉大学(UPM)2名讲师涉嫌抄袭他人作品。
« 回复 #5 于: 九月 17, 2009, 12:07:17 上午 »



Tuesday September 15, 2009

UPM lecturers hauled up over plagiarism
By KAREN CHAPMAN

http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/9/15/nation/4713248&sec=nation


PETALING JAYA: A stern warning will be given to two Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) lecturers for plagiarising materials from the Internet to produce a guide book.

UPM vice-chancellor Prof Datuk Dr Nik Mustapha R. Abdullah said this warning would also be included in their service records, which would affect their promotion.

“The management decided to take this action following advice from the legal department that the two be given very stern warnings,” he said when contacted.

Prof Dr Nik Mustapha said the university viewed the case seriously and did not condone it.

“No one will be suspended but they have to return any royalty received,” he said.

He said the guide books would be removed from the (university’s) shelves immediately.

He was commenting on a news report that two UPM lecturers had plagiarised materials to produce a guide book on writing effective resumes for management students.

Prof Dr Nik Mustapha said the legal department had made suggestions to the management on the disciplinary action to be taken after personally meeting the authors.

“The junior author, who recently completed her PhD, said that since the source was from the Internet, she thought the information was in the public domain and as such did not cite the article,” he said.

Prof Dr Nik Mustapha said the senior author admitted to the legal team that the manuscript looked all right to him, not realising that it was taken from another work.

“Since this is a guide book, we decided that the punishment was reasonable,” he said.

Prof Dr Nik Mustapha said that the two authors have apologised for their ignorance, adding that the plagiarism did not affect UPM undergraduates as the work was not a textbook.

Higher Education Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin when contacted said the ministry viewed the matter seriously. “We will leave it to the university to conduct an investigation and take action,” he said.

[email protected]


zhengyichang.wordpress.com